A) South Africas Best Brand Voted by our Readers in the Renewable Energy/Load Shedding.

RENTECH ÔÇô THE TOTAL WINNER ! THE BEST BRAND INVERTORS, PORTABLE POWER SOLUTIONS, SOLAR SOLUTIONS AND THE LIST JUST CONTINUES.

THE LEADING SOUTH AFRICAN BRAND – RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR 2023/24!

VOTED BY OUR READERS.

A) RENEWABLE ENERGY & LOAD SHEDDING. THE LEADING SOUTH AFRICAN BRAND 2023/2024 IS RENTECH!

B)  The winner of the 4×4 (SUV) Motor Vehicle.

The winner of the worst Motor Vehicle 4×4/SUV is the Mahindra Pikup. The Mahindra Pikup. 4×4(D/C) is the winner of the worst 4×4 vehicle on the planet. Mahindra won both awards for 2023/24 it also was the winner of the motor vehicle with the worst resale value ever in the history of automotives in South Africa.

The winner of the worst Motor Vehicle 4×4/SUV is the Mahindra Pikup. The Mahindra Pikup. 4×4(D/C) is the winner of the worst 4×4 vehicle on the planet. Mahindra won both awards for 2023/24 it also was the winner of the motor vehicle with the worst resale value ever in the history of automotives in South Africa.

The Leading South African Brand for 2023/2024 is Rentech! Voted by our Readers Rentech was far ahead of any other brand throught southern Africa.

(Above) This is the top of the line the reccomended revesre camera that we where tols was included in the Pikup 4×4 D/C brand new togther with tire pressure sesors to name just one other feature we were told come standard with the most expensive model. The truth is it cost over R12 000.00 and this is how it was delivered. A brabd bew vehcile and how long do you think the camera lasted when driver off-road or that is what we were told a vehcilw vosting something like R40000.00 less than the Toyota, Nissan etc. How can the dealer deliver a new vehicle with wires and cables hanging down to the ground.The firsrt photo is also of the same vehicle apparantly this vehicle was delivered brand new to the purchaser in hindsight I am told the dealer principle removed the factory rims and tires and replaced themwith heap Chinese tires that was knowingly fitted so the dealer could pocket a few extra thousands rand and in the porocess made the factory warrant null and void. This according to the purchaser was not a used vehicle but a brand new vehicle delivered imagine delering a brand new vehicle after literally stealing the factory tires for an exta buck knowing the new vehicle would lose the 5 or 6 years 100000km factoryu warranty. It took over 365 days for the dealer to change the rims and tires back to the factory or stock componemts leaving terrivle damage as for the entire year this so alled 4×4 was not able to turn more than 60% turning circle and this was not off road but on the roof at Sandton city with smooth concete surfact completely flat as the body of the vehicle would rub against the tires and the onlt way we could drive this new 4×4 with less than 50 km on the clock was keeping the steering wheel turned less than 60%. According to the purchase a read who voted on the resale value the dealer nhas added a clause to the contract poreventing common law and making the consumer act into a laughing matter. As the vehicle was returned the foillowing day then the foillowing Monday but the dealer proudly eplained that the ouchaser sighned the contraxr that had been mofified according to the purchaser who has no legal knowlwsge he claims the consumer act or the law toi protect buyers from these dealers cannot be changed if iut was changed as described for the prevention of returning the vehicle in hindsight that does not make any differance as the vehicle was delivered as a used vehicle having the dealerchabging these componests was no longer selling a new vehicle and then denied that anything has been tampered with until a 4×4ÔÇéforment centre explained the trickery furthermore Ithe seller purchased the vehicle for off-road driving and with 210mm of clearance and 15 inch tires not one expert bud at least 5 fitment cenres all gave the purchase the same truths. Claiming if the purchaser explained the purchase of the vehicle was exclusivly for off-road I understand even the rails where nebntioned that the vehicle was required ro compete the salesman described by the principle as her leading salesman so bot a newby went out of his way to sell a road vewhicle when the purchaser requested and made it clear the only reason for the purchase was for its off-road cabability. During the year the selller retuned the vehicle at least 6 times first after 59 km to trey do a tradein on a Toyotam Nissan and naby other vehicles and making it worse the firmewnt cenres explained the undercaeeiage was like a machano set and not only could bigger tires not be fitted but it is the only 4×4 pikup that not one of the fitment cenres had parts or would attmept to upgrade the suspension or even the clearance lift by 1 cm was out of the question and that the fitment centre explained is why the Mahindra is ‘affordable; infact you are purchasing a delivery road vehicle that cannot complete with the old Suxuki with clearance of about 8 inches not to mention the 15 or 16 inch tyres an inch largwr than the Mahinbdra.

Next week we will write another three replies from buyers who had the same experiencen just about and also tried to return the vheclpe the following day and apparantly the contaxt was also cut and deleted as the seller know what they had done and expected the vehicles to be returned. The purchase added saying dont beieve me. Try searching on Google for reviews and in blrackets put good and bad reviews. The buyers mistake he saidis in his excitment he search posative reviews and found a paid review thathe thought was strang ebut when he searchfor all reviews he got the shock of his life.

We do not take resonsibiklity for these reviews as we take it at face valur but after checking tons of photos anmd their origionality we devcided based on the image program that gave a thubs up daying the pgptps were origional this the publication